Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Iterator Range, sub range of a desired size
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-30 05:57:27
> While respecting Thorsten's opinion and the wish to provide convenience
> functions to our users, I'm not keen on introducing make_iterator_range
> (iterator, size_type) it seems like an unnecessary addition that would
> not significantly improve syntax.
I have no strong preference for this, and as the responces show, there
are plenty of ways do it. So I with you.
-Thorsten