Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Signals2] Signal memory overhead
From: Sean Buckheister (s_buckhe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-21 11:19:25
> So if that is the case, you might as well use Signals1 instead of 2, if
> you don't need any synchronization and are concerned about the overhead.
I've measured Signals (without 2) as well, it's even worse. Don't ask me
how or why, I don't understand it either.