Subject: Re: [Boost-users] A forward iterator need not be default-constructible
From: Andrew Sutton (asutton.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-30 13:59:11
> The underlying values that would need to be compared are potentially
> "trap" values (c.f. C++99/6.2.6/5).
Ah... That's very informative. I don't have a C standard on hand. Thanks.