Subject: Re: [Boost-users] A forward iterator need not be default-constructible
From: Krzysztof Żelechowski (giecrilj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-29 05:05:49
Nathan Ridge wrote:
>
> I would suggest making your case about the default constructibility of
> forward iterators at comp.std.c++. If you gain consensus there that
> this requirement is indeed misguided, then your request will carry
> more weight here.
Greater minds than mine did and failed (by being ignored); who am I to
confront such a valiant enemy? My only hope is to smuggle common sense
under the radar ;-)
Chris