Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Distance/size of boost ranges for std::set.
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-11 12:31:32
On 11/10/10 10:32, Matthew Gwynne wrote:
> Should we simply be extending the boost::size function with additional
> overloaded versions specific to std::set if we wish to use it in this
> way (is this reasonable?)?
There was an idea of making boost::size(c) call c.size(), boost::sort(c)
use c.sort() etc. if those were available.
I don't know what exactly happened to that idea, or why it was scrapped.