- Next message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [Boost-users] [GIL] does gil::variant<mpl::vector3<A, B, C> > constructor accept instances of gil::variant<mpl::vector2<A, B> > ?"
- Previous message: Lubomir Bourdev: "Re: [Boost-users] [GIL] does gil::variant<mpl::vector3<A, B, C> > constructor accept instances of gil::variant<mpl::vector2<A, B> > ?"
- In reply to: David A. Greene: "[Boost-users] [proto, fusion] Segfault in for_each"
- Next in thread: David Greene: "Re: [Boost-users] [proto, fusion] Segfault in for_each"
- Reply: David Greene: "Re: [Boost-users] [proto, fusion] Segfault in for_each"
- Reply: David A. Greene: "Re: [Boost-users] [proto, fusion] Segfault in for_each"
On 5/10/2010 6:53 PM, David A. Greene wrote:
> I'm using boost 1.42. As part of a proto transform, I am flattening an
> expression tree of comma operators and sending it to fusion::transform
> followed by fusion::for_each, something like this:
>
> for_each(transform(flatten(expr), func1), func2)
>
> I am getting a segmentation fault in for_each.
<snip>
> I've been wrestling with this for days. Any ideas on how to debug this?
Nope. But it'd probably help if you sent around a self-contained repro.
--
Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com
- Next message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [Boost-users] [GIL] does gil::variant<mpl::vector3<A, B, C> > constructor accept instances of gil::variant<mpl::vector2<A, B> > ?"
- Previous message: Lubomir Bourdev: "Re: [Boost-users] [GIL] does gil::variant<mpl::vector3<A, B, C> > constructor accept instances of gil::variant<mpl::vector2<A, B> > ?"
- In reply to: David A. Greene: "[Boost-users] [proto, fusion] Segfault in for_each"
- Next in thread: David Greene: "Re: [Boost-users] [proto, fusion] Segfault in for_each"
- Reply: David Greene: "Re: [Boost-users] [proto, fusion] Segfault in for_each"
- Reply: David A. Greene: "Re: [Boost-users] [proto, fusion] Segfault in for_each"