Subject: Re: [Boost-users] sizeof of boost::int8_t
From: Dominique Devienne (ddevienne_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-16 13:54:29
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Perhaps the "mistake" is not having typedef create a truely new type.
> Or maybe a new keyword "strong_typedef".
Kinda like D's typedefs (~ your strong_typedef) v.s. its aliases (~
C/C++ typedef)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/type.html (search for typedef)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/comparison.html#StrongTypedefs