Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Sockets and structures?
From: Brian Wood (woodbrian77_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-26 22:50:50
Daniel F. Savarese writes:
> To the OP, I would advise you not take statements such as the above as
> gospel without performing measurements yourself. My experience[1] is
> directly contrary to the above. I find boost::serialization execution
> time to be negligible (for binary archives) and entirely suitable for high
> performance networking applications even if that was not the creator's
> original objective (a credit to Robert Ramey's skill).
With respect for the library and Ramey, I'd like to point out
Additionally, the C++ Middleware Writer automates the
Regards,
"Then Samuel took a rock and set it up between
that results obtained with the Boost Serialization library are
frequently less efficient than those from the C++ Middleware
Writer -- http://webEbenezer.net/comparison.html
.
job of writing serialization functions for structs/classes
unless it is directed not to do so.
Brian Wood
Ebenezer Enterprises
www.webEbenezer.net
Mizpah and Shen. He named it Ebenezer [Rock of
Help] and said, 'Until now the L-RD has helped us.'"