Subject: Re: [Boost-users] shared_ptr and weak_ptr concurrency
From: Rajeev Rao (rbsrao79_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-04 12:06:59
Even assuming its possible for pointer assignments to be atomic on a given implementation, I don't think it follows that shared_ptr assignments will be atomic (since there is a change to the count and the actual pointer).
Rajeev
--- On Fri, 9/4/09, John Dlugosz <JDlugosz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
From: John Dlugosz <JDlugosz_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] shared_ptr and weak_ptr concurrency
To: "boost-users_at_[hidden]" <boost-users_at_[hidden]>
Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 9:28 PM
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users_at_[hidden]
http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users