Subject: Re: [Boost-users] cycle iterators
From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-02 19:15:16
er wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> er wrote:
>>
>>> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>>>> AMDG
>>>> What does the default constructor have to do with it?
>>>>
>>>> Also, the enable_if you
>>>> put on it is wrong.
>>>>
>>> Since enable_if is wrong (no ::type), then I guess it is the other
>>> change (accessing the base through super_t) which corrects the problem
>>> below, right?
>>>
>> ...
>> Is there some problem you're trying to solve?
>
> Replace "problem" by "error".
Can you provide an example of use that shows the problem/error?