Subject: Re: [Boost-users] cycle iterators
From: er (erwann.rogard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-31 19:11:51
I'm not sure if I already asked in a private conversion, but even if I
did, this the occasion to ask again : why not have an assignment
operator for cycle_iterator? I think the base iterator could be replaced
by that which is contained in super_t.