Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [proto] folding a proto tree in reverse
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-30 12:00:19
Maurizio Vitale wrote:
> Sorry for the noise, please disregard the previous post. I was missing
> the state in the invocation of the fold. Which is ok, when you don't
> have a data (it gets default constructed, which would have been ok for
> me), but cannot possibly work with data.
Good, I was just sitting down to write a response. So did you get it
working with proto::reverse_fold_tree?. Using fusion algorithms with
proto::flatten will surely lead to long compile times.
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com