Subject: [Boost-users] boost 1.40 beta libs, no longer include compiler version/boost version ?
From: Avi Bahra (avibahra_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-18 06:47:59
Volodya wrote:
> The default naming of libraries in Unix-like environment now matches
system conventions, and does
> not include various decorations.
>
> Does this answer your question?
Ok so it was done deliberately. Why the change, the decorations were
useful in denoting the
kind of library ?
How stable is this decision is likely to change, between now and the
release.?
-- Best regards, Ta, Avi