Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [random] Singleton engine
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-29 00:02:54
AMDG
Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
> My code has now become what is pasted below. It does the trick and
> allows for singletons with a parameterized constructor.
>
> This leaves the question of whether a singleton library would be a
> useful addition to boost. I would be willing to code and write, though
> this would be a learning process for me.
>
A Singleton library was rejected a while back if
I recall correctly. You can search the mailing list
archives if you're interested.
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe