Subject: [Boost-users] [test] Ignoring SIGCHLD for signal codes other than CLD_EXITED
From: Gevorg Voskanyan (v_gevorg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-08 06:26:05
I could not find a response to the following message:
http://listarchives.boost.org/boost-users/2008/09/40618.php
, which proposes to modify ignore_sigchild() implementation to account for a proposed BOOST_TEST_IGNORE_SIGCHLD preprocessor switch.
I am seconding this request. Has it ever been considered? Or was it the message simply went unnoticed?
Thanks,
Gevorg