Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Periodic Timer
From: amit khandelwal (khandelwal.amit_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-10 09:12:29
Thanks for your help
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Igor R <boost.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Also, wouldn't the function call itself have an overhead? If yes, is
> there a
> > way to get around it ?
> >
>
> Well, there exists some overhead at each "iteration", but if you've
> got a fixed reference-time, these overheads wouldn't accumulate, so
> after 2 or 1000 iterations you'd have about the same deviation.
> As for the deviation itself, you just have to try and evaluate it with
> your compiler/machine...
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ph : (732) 647 5679 Email: khandelwal.amit_at_[hidden] Web: http://khandelwal.amit.googlepages.com/home -------------------------------------------------------------------