From: joel falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-11 13:58:34
> With the way boost::result_of is implemented, I couldn't find a way
to
> make an approach like the above work. The best I could do
was the
> result_of_defined code.
So we're stuck with
the implementation I gave earlier but with a rather weak semantic as some
type can give false positive ... For me it's enough anyway as most of the
time the problem lies in a missing result struct.
So anyway,
what can we do to access this ?