From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-23 16:51:32
AMDG
Joel FALCOU wrote:
> This works nice but it is somehow slow for larger value of MAX_VAL
> and cumbersome to extand cause of the list.
>
How large a MAX_VAL? at 11 you are already generating 1296 specializations.
> Is there anyway I can produce the same code using a better PP code ?
>
I personally prefer SEQ to LIST...
(0)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe