From: Igor R. (igor_rubinov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-09 03:35:58
> The fact that transition actions are members of simple_state<> subclasses. If > you apply the pattern outlined in the FAQ item, none of these classes are > visible to FSM clients. Looking at> > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_35_0/libs/statechart/doc/faq.html#HideInnerWorkings
Is it possible to apply this apporoach to the asynchronous_state_machine?
For some reasone, trying to do so in my program causes compiler error: "use of undefined type 'Active'". Probably, I've done something wrong, but I'd like to know if it should work theoretically, before I turn my code upside down :).
Thanks!
_________________________________________________________________
Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline