From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-27 15:32:25
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Sohail Somani <sohail_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:00:34 +0000, Sohail Somani wrote:
>
[snip]
> > Anyway, if there was an is_tuple<T> metafunction, there would be a more
> > elegant way to do it:
>
> Hmm, no I lied. You couldn't do it this way because then the overload
> would be ambiguous when it matched. I think...
Ambigous with what?
> --
> Sohail Somani
> http://uint32t.blogspot.com
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida