From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-27 10:41:58
On 26/11/2007, Bryan Green <bgreen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'm forced to take boost::array out of my computation's inner loop.
> Is this a previously known issue? Any ideas why this performance
> discrepancy might exist?
>
I know that boost::array asserts that the index is in-range when using
operator[] (as it's caught a few bugs for me), but that's an overhead
that -O3 isn't going to eliminate. As KSpam mentioned, try with
-DNDEBUG as well.
~ Scott
-- Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?