From: Sohail Somani (sohail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-21 20:42:15
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:56:59 +0100, Fabian Sturm wrote:
> A well I guess I wasn't expressing good enough. I look for a nice
> solution where thread B is completely independent of A. But A waits for
> B doing some work.
I don't think there is a nice solution but I'm pretty sure you would need
two way communication and I don't envy you having to debug and test that.
-- Sohail Somani http://uint32t.blogspot.com