From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-30 03:18:59
Lars J. Aas <parawaiter <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > On 9/21/07, Gennadiy Rozental <rogeeff <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
Hi, Lars,
Sorry for delay. I am busy these days.
> > Can you provide an error messages?
>
> > Sure.Â
Thanks for the report.
Unfortunately current implementation of the expected failres support for auto
test cases can't be easily modified to work within another namespace. I had to
rework it and now I have proper solution. I'll try to commit it to svn once I
figure out how.
> > Does anybody know if this is possible at all? Could it be
possible,programmatically, from within the test-case? Lars J
> You can always register some test cases manually.
>
> All the tests are auto-extracted from random files and compiled as separate
object files, and the framework doesn't really know which files it is linked
against, so it would definitely be most convenient if I could rely on the auto-
registering functionality.
> There is no way to get hold of the "currently-being-executed" test_unit
object?
framework has a method for an access to the currently executed test case.
Gennadiy