$include_dir="/home/hyper-archives/boost-users/include"; include("$include_dir/msg-header.inc") ?>
From: Sam Lievesley (sam.lievesley_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-10 12:46:23
Hi,
I am trying to avoid thread locking problems when waiting using a boost::condition
pseudo code:
Main thread
    -- Start a worker thread --
    boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(m_Mutex);
    m_Condition.notify_one();
Worker thread
    boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(m_Mutex);
    while (IsAlive()) {
            // do some work
            m_Condition.wait(lock);
    }
As we can't predict which thread gets the mutex lock first lets assume that its the main thread. If this happens then m_Condition.wait will wait indefinitely as notify was called before wait. The only reliable way (that I can see) to prevent this is to never use wait, use a timed_wait instead and a loop. Why isn't the notification signal queued in the boost::condition object? Then the order of wait / notification would not be important.
thanks
Sam