From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-03 21:39:52
>> Would it be prudent to patch the Boost headers to only define
>> WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN if it is not already defined? If not, is there another
>> solution that I am overlooking.
Ok, I dropped WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN from Spirit. I discussed it with
Hartmut and neither of us know where that came from. Probably a
pre-boost artifact.
Regards,
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net