From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-02 13:39:26
> "Pierre-Jules Tremblay" <iamtrep_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:4590bfef0707230842t2e296753g9546b73e2de8cc25_at_mail.gmail.com...
> Just for my personal culture, given that your object will have a
> vtable anyway, what's wrong with a virtual dtor() ?
>
> Cheers,
Nothing really. It just doesn't have to be. If by any chance the design
will
change, I do not want destructor to be the only virtual function.
Gennadiy