From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-06 11:37:52
Anders Wang Kristensen wrote:
> That solution is really impractical, IMHO.
> If this is really the only solution, I would consider the
> serialization lib broken wrt to DLLs, and that should be in the docs
> somewhere.
>
> That's really too bad, since it is such a nice and useful library!
>
> I.e. how would you solve the following, if A and B are unrelated
> libraries in seperate DLLs sharing a class X that is serialized as
> part of serializing A and B?
>
Place code to implement X in its own DLL.
Robert Ramey