From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-27 09:13:43
On Jun 26, 2007, at 5:05 PM, gast128 wrote:
> Since no one react, I tried to reverse engineer Boost.Function and
> pin down
> the problem:
>
> template <typename R, typename Arg1>
> struct Functor
> {
> template <typename F>
> Functor(F f, int i = 0)
> : m_pf(0)
> {
> m_pf = reinterpret_cast<Pf>(f);
> }
>
> template <typename T>
> R Invoke(T t)
> {
> typedef R (*Pf1)(Arg1);
> return (*(Pf1)m_pf)(t);
> }
>
> typedef void (*Pf)(void);
> Pf m_pf;
> };
>
> template <typename T>
> bool func_template(T* p)
> {
> return p != 0;
> }
>
> void TestBugFunctor()
> {
> Functor<bool, int*> fc2 = &func_template<int>;
> fc2.Invoke((int*)0); //crash
> }
>
>
> The trick with the extra dummy constructor argument is copied form
> boost
> function header files. Without it one gets an ICE, but with it,
> VStudio 2003
> sp1 generates a suspectable call.
Oh, that's bad. I don't have this compiler on hand to work with... if
someone has a workaround, I would gladly apply it to Boost.Function.
- Doug