Boost users' mailing page: Re: [Boost-users] bjam versus solaris versus gcc versus ld

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Benson Margulies (bim2007_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-21 13:01:26

Next message: Zeljko Vrba: "Re: [Boost-users] Compile failure with fairlysimpleuseofmulti-index/hashing on Solaris with CC 5.8 (boost 1.34.0)"
Previous message: K. Noel Belcourt: "Re: [Boost-users] bjam versus solaris versus gcc versus ld"
In reply to: K. Noel Belcourt: "Re: [Boost-users] bjam versus solaris versus gcc versus ld"
Next in thread: Benson Margulies: "Re: [Boost-users] Compile failure with fairly simple use of multi-index/hashing on Solaris with CC 5.8 (boost 1.34.0)"

>
> Since your gcc compiler was configured to use Sun's ld, try adding
>
> <linker-type>sun
>

[BIM] ... sure enough, that gets me a working build in gcc-land.

Next message: Zeljko Vrba: "Re: [Boost-users] Compile failure with fairlysimpleuseofmulti-index/hashing on Solaris with CC 5.8 (boost 1.34.0)"
Previous message: K. Noel Belcourt: "Re: [Boost-users] bjam versus solaris versus gcc versus ld"
In reply to: K. Noel Belcourt: "Re: [Boost-users] bjam versus solaris versus gcc versus ld"
Next in thread: Benson Margulies: "Re: [Boost-users] Compile failure with fairly simple use of multi-index/hashing on Solaris with CC 5.8 (boost 1.34.0)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view