From: me22 (me22.ca_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-11 23:43:54
On 11/06/07, Ruediger Berlich <ruediger.berlich_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I might (have to). But clarification of the intentions by the maintainers
> and authors of Boost or the Boost Software License could give a much
> clearer picture.
>
> I see this definition as a very central point.
>
Have you read all of the Boost Software License Background page?
( http://boost.org/more/license_info.html )
Also, the FSF is the only organization I know of that considers "use"
of a library to be a derivative work of that library. IIRC, Rosen
considers that interpretation tenuous.
~ Scott McMurray