Boost users' mailing page: Re: [Boost-users] DeSerialization to update content of objectinsteadof construct new object

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-15 21:58:44

Next message: Nicholas Bastin: "[Boost-users] Link error with test boost.signals app (boost::throw_exception?)"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [Boost-users] [Serialization] purpose of GUID"
In reply to: Matthias Troyer: "Re: [Boost-users] DeSerialization to update content of object insteadof construct new object"
Next in thread: Ng Pan: "Re: [Boost-users] DeSerialization to update content of objectinsteadof construct new object"
Maybe reply: Ng Pan: "Re: [Boost-users] DeSerialization to update content of objectinsteadof construct new object"

Matthias Troyer wrote:
> Another, maybe easier option, could be to overload the serialization
> functions for std::vector<base *> .

Actually - that sounds much simpler than my ideas.

Robert Ramey

Next message: Nicholas Bastin: "[Boost-users] Link error with test boost.signals app (boost::throw_exception?)"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [Boost-users] [Serialization] purpose of GUID"
In reply to: Matthias Troyer: "Re: [Boost-users] DeSerialization to update content of object insteadof construct new object"
Next in thread: Ng Pan: "Re: [Boost-users] DeSerialization to update content of objectinsteadof construct new object"
Maybe reply: Ng Pan: "Re: [Boost-users] DeSerialization to update content of objectinsteadof construct new object"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view