From: Scott Meyers (usenet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-28 20:00:11
Ovanes Markarian wrote:
> Just as addition to the issue: here you deal with a set. And in the
> Extensible Associative Sequence the position is ignored (at least according
> to the docs). So you can skip the usage of end<Constraints>.
Right, but as I noted in my original post, (1) using the two-argument form for
insert does not change the observed behavior, and (2) I'd prefer to use the form
taking a position, anyway, in case I decide to start using a container like
mpl:: vector.
At this point, however, I'd be happy to use any form that actually results in a
new sequence that has one more element than the original sequence.
Scott