From: Frank Mori Hess (fmhess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-25 23:31:17
On Sunday 25 February 2007 07:40 pm, Timmo Stange wrote:
>
> A signal would then rather be a handle object, or not? I wouldn't
> see a problem in this if it were just for the invocation and
> connection to another signal, but with member functions like
> connect() and disconnect() it would appear like a rather unusual
> construct to me.
It would be like signals::connection, which is a handle object and has a
disconnect().
-- Frank