From: Frank Mori Hess (fmhess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-21 18:43:56
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 05:12 pm, Timmo Stange wrote:
>
> Hm, ok, I see boost::bind a little differently, but as you mention it, I
> would prefer such an approach above a member function (a tracked object
> binder).
How about a two-argument form of boost::track()? One argument would be the
value passed through to bind (or directly to the connect call), the other
argument would be the shared_ptr used for tracking.
-- Frank