From: Bob Kline (bkline_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-06 13:33:49
On 2/6/2007 7:31 AM, John Maddock wrote:
> Is there any reason why you can't simplify your expression to just
> "^[^\\s]+( ([^\\s]+)*)?$" which does the same thing much more efficiently?
No reason at all. I have no idea why we didn't see that when were
looking at this originally, unless it was just way too late in the
afternoon that day. :-) Thanks, John (and Peter, who also suggested the
same simplification), and sorry for the wasted bandwidth.
Bob