From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-13 11:29:40
I would be very interested in getting to the bottom of the problem. This
would likely result in a small tweak which would make the library more
portable. Of course I realise that this is not that easy. Note that I test
here with gcc 3.3 under cywin. So I would be hopeful that its easily
fixable. I don't know what version of boost your using, but it may already
be fixed in a later version.
Robert Ramey
vermaaso wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 09:20:49AM -0800, Robert Ramey wrote:
>>
>> So I would try reformlating your example like the following:
>>
>> ...
>
>
> I tried your suggestions, but on the Suse gcc 3.3.3 I still get
> the segfault. For now, I will switch platforms/compilers (your
> library has proven to be very usefull in the past for us) ..
>
> regards,
> Oscar