From: Arnaldur Gylfason (arnaldur.gylfason_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-23 11:34:40
>The second, more critical point: The implementation does not seem to be
the
>correct inverse of the original function. Boost's implementation (with
above
>modification) is:
> -result_type(1) / _lambda * log(eng());
>But should actually be:
> -log(eng()) / _lamda;
The expressions are the same because of operator associativiy. (i.e. x/y*z
= (x/y)*z )
I believe you are right about the first point though.
cheers
Arnaldur