From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-17 14:25:40
So now you know my intention - and I believe that the code reflects that.
I'm guessing that the key might be that the DLL gets unloaded "too soon"
so that we get a seg fault by invoking code that is no longer in memory.
But as you have discovered - this is very problematic to track down and
could be a subtle error of my own, an error in the language support system
(loading/unloading DLLS). Overzealous optimization on the compiler's part
or something else entirely.
Sorry I can't be of more help. Good Luck
Robert Ramey