From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-14 18:22:29
Jens Theisen <jth02_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I'm not complaining that `factor' must have been default constructed.
> I'm worrying about the return value, which is represented by the `val'
> closure member. The point where we know what to return is where the
> assignments are, but by design we must have some value earlier than
> that.
Ah, I understand.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com