From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-14 14:14:53
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> No, a singular iterator is not a valid object and it fulfills no
> invariants.
That's arguable. From my POV, if it's in a state that a legal program
can create, it's within the invariant by definition.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com