From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-13 10:12:30
"Oliver Mutz" <omutz_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Loïc Joly wrote:
>> Nat Goodspeed a écrit :
>>>
>>> I haven't yet worked with a serialization framework smart enough to
>>> consider constructor arguments. (I haven't yet worked with the Boost
>>> Serialization library, either; forgive me if this is already a solved
>>> problem.)
>>
>> Boost::serialization requires a constructor with no arguments.
>
> That's not right I'm afraid.
And thank goodness.
> See the "Non-Default Constructors" part of the serialization library
> documentation for details. The problem still might be that you
> don't have the right data available while deserializing your object.
Then you can't usefully construct it. What's the point in making a
broken instance?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com