From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-05 09:45:03
Cromwell Enage wrote:
> 1. Will BOOST_PARAMETER_IMPL(name) expand to the name
> of the function that actually "owns" the main body of
> code?
No, or at least is doesn't at this point.
> 2. Will there be a way to define a
> Boost.Parameterized member function outside the class
> definition? Or should we let the compiler decide
> whether or not to inline such a function?
It is possible, but it's complicated by the return-type calculation. For
example, the expansion-tail of:
BOOST_PARAMETER_FUNCTION(
(void), f, tag,
(required (x, (float))
(optional (y, (float), 0))
)
is something like:
template <
class ResultType
, class Args
, class x_type
, class y_type
>
ResultType boost_param_default_21f(
ResultType(*)()
, Args const& args
, x_type& x
, y_type& y
)
right now. We could improve the name and get rid of the __LINE__ from
it, but it's hard (or impossible) to get rid of ResultType argument.
-- Daniel Wallin