From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-04 15:09:41
Yuval Ronen <ronen_yuval_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> That's one other option. Another option is just to work with the
>> concepts as they are and stop trying to convince us they're
>> ill-conceived. What's wrong with that one? I don't mean to be
>> facetious, but you seem to be grasping at straws to show that there's
>> something wrong here, but I don't see what major problems the status
>> quo is causing.
>
> I was hoping to get to the bottom of this, to fully understand what's
> going on, and why, to convince or be convinced. However, if you are
> unwilling to continue this discussion, then, well, you have every right
> to do so.
Well, it doesn't seem all that productive. At some point, which
requirements to make part of a concept is a judgement call. There are
guidelines that ought to be followed, but some decisions fall into a
gray area. You might legitimately choose differently from Aleksey,
but I don't think the validity of your choice delegitimizes his
choice, which is what you seem to be arguing.
> We'll just go our separate ways, each maintaining his original
> opinion, one of us (me) is wrong.
I don't see why you would maintain your original opinion if you were
convinced it was wrong.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com