From: Russell Hind (rh_gmane_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-16 09:24:56
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
>> I understood your original post and by "puke" I obviously meant throw
>> an exception --- what else did you expect? A silent exit? Core dump?
>
> As far as I understand it, "access violation" is a segmentation
> fault, so yes, it is core dumping for him.
>
Yes, av's are seg faults, gpf's, core dumps or whatever else you want to
term them. Sorry if that was misleading. It definitely wasn't throwing
an exception which is what I wanted and why I asked about getting at the
version so I could throw an exception myself to prevent the core dump.
Cheers
Russell