From: Kobi Cohen-Arazi (kobi.cohenarazi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-14 13:16:07
On 6/14/06, me22 <me22.ca_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps it's just being "better safe than sorry". It's possible that
> a problem was noticed on a compiler with faulty ADL or when someone
> did struct foo : boost::noncopyable { ... }; without thinking of the
> ADL implications.
Whats wrong with that struct foo : boost::noncopyable { ... }; ? I assume
that public inheritance will be a problem, or am I missing here something?
-- - Kobi