From: Steven E. Harris (seh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-14 12:22:01
me22 <me22.ca_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Presumably if noncopyable were defined in namespace boost, then
> function calls involving classes deriving from noncopyable would get
> namespace boost added to the ADL scopes in which the function is
> looked up.
Even if the derivation is private, as it should be for such an
implementation detail?
-- Steven E. Harris