From: Prashant Thakre (prashant.thakre_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-09 01:57:41
Hi,
> Excuse me, but I don't get what your suggestion or question is.
> Would you mind rephrasing or elaborating some more?
> Thank you.
Wrong choice of words I would say, wasn't trying to suggest anything :(
I actually wanted to know the type of container best suited in terms of
performance, insert/lookup operations and memory requirements from the two
listed below (keys are known only at run-time):
1. Composite keys and hashed indices.
2. Hashed indices.
Regards,
Prashant Thakre
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z <joaquin <at> tid.es> writes:
>
> ----- Mensaje original -----
> De: Prashant Thakre <prashant.thakre <at> gmail.com>
> Fecha: Jueves, Junio 8, 2006 8:46 pm
> Asunto: Re: [Boost-users] [multi index].[composite key] Index creation
> atrun-time.
>
> > One final suggestion :) regarding the choice of index_container in
> > terms of performance,
> > memory requirements, serialization support and insert/lookup
> > opreations considering that std::vector<const std::string> will be
> the
> > basis for this container :
> > 1.Composite keys and hashed indices.
> > 2.Hashed indices.
>
> Excuse me, but I don't get what your suggestion or
> question is.
> Would you mind rephrasing or elaborating some more?
> Thank you.
>