From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-03 10:53:15
Bill Lear wrote:
> Thanks for the note. I did run under the debugger --- the call stack
> was note merely long, it was unbelievable. I'm running on a
> reasonably fast, high-memory machine, and when I asked the debugger
> for a stack trace, it took over an hour to print 60,000+ frames. I
> gave up at that point.
Since you don't have 60,000 functions in your program, that would almost
surely indicate a stack overflow due to un-terminated recursion. Just
look at the stack back from the end the recursion should be obvious.
Robert Ramey