From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-20 20:53:21
On 3/20/06, Nat Goodspeed <ngoodspeed_at_[hidden]> wrote:
[snip]
> Indeed, for our purposes, we don't WANT smart pointers in the registry.
> If the last smart-pointer reference to a heap object goes away, we don't
> want the reference in the registry to make the instance immortal. In
> that case, the smart pointer to the heap object decrements the count to
> 0, the object is destroyed, and its destructor unregisters the instance.
Couldnt be a weak_ptr ?
[snip]
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida