From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-13 01:44:45
Doug Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> writes:
> We can't overload dynamic_cast, which is too bad: that's the right
> name for this sort of thing.
Maybe; I'm not so sure. xxx_cast implies capability that you probably
wouldn't get from variant, like the ability to tell if some base class
of the currently-stored type were available.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com